Showing posts with label pathogen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pathogen. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Sampling Trends from the FSIS

In the Powerpoint Document released by the FSIS ("FSIS Notice 65-07") it is stated:

"During the summer of 2007, a number of unfavorable trends emerged, causing concern about E. coli 0157:H7." They are as follows:

  • The percent positive rate for E. coli O157:H7 in FSIS samples of beef products has recently gone up.
  • The number of recalls for E. coli O157:H7 went up this summer.
  • The number of illnesses caused by E. coli O157:H7 increased this summer.
  • Food safety assessments at establishments producing product that tested positive by FSIS for E. coli O157:H7 raised questions about the decisions establishments made in the hazard analysis.
It goes on to make a list of "best practices," or things that, as the document states, "are essential to controlling E. coli O157:H7." These standards however are NOT mandatory.
No wonder we have a food safety problem. We know how to prevent the bacteria, but no one requires it.

Monday, January 7, 2008

"Zone" vs. "Spot" Contamination

The probability of bacterial contamination within a given general area of a particular production facility may form the basis of QC management for that facility. This “zone theory” concept simply divides the plant (physically or theoretically) into common areas based on similar probabilities of contaminated product or equipment. Measures are typically taken to restrict movement of materials and personnel from zones of higher contamination probabilities to “clearer” zones since “dirty” materials could increase the probability of cross contamination. Each zone may be further subdivided into “sub-zones” as needed to sensibly manage the QC of that area.

Individual swipe samples, taken from a single 4-16 sq in. surface area, would typically be considered a “spot” sample within a specified zone. Multiple spot samples, taken from a pre-determined specified large area (zone), and which are later combined or pooled by the lab would qualify as “zoned” samples. This procedure is followed in some facilities in order to more cost effectively “screen” zones within the facility. Management knows that by sampling larger surface areas within a zone, the probability of discovering contamination, if present, increases proportionally. Management would consider a positive pooled sample for the microbe(s) in question to be a good indicator that the entire zone or sub-zone was contaminated. That entire area (zone or sub-zone) would then be cleaned and sanitized as needed to correct the problem. This procedure is often used to reduce laboratory costs but also because managers know that any contaminated equipment, surface or material within a sub-zone, for example, will eventually spread to other areas within that zone or possibly to other locations throughout the facility. Further, he knows that all equipment, tools or work surfaces will be cleaned whether the positive came back from an individual sample or a pooled sample.


Monday, December 10, 2007

Finding Pathogens

Location/discovery involves determining the region in which the pathogens might be found and then locating the pathogens within that area with the sampling device. Conventional sampling devices, such as swabs and sponges only effectively sample small surface areas. Swabs and sponges typically are used to sample a 2x2 and 4x4 in area respectively, as recommended by NASA and The American Society for Microbiology’s Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. These small sampling sizes lower the probability of locating and discovering the pathogens within a given area. To make up for the small surface area, more samples are needed to accurately test a given location, subsequently increasing field and laboratory equipment costs and time.
If pathogens are located in a few “hot spots” randomly distributed over a large area, the probability of locating the “hot spots” with swabs or sponges is very low due to the small surface area of individual samples, therefore producing false negatives. This may cause people to be exposed to contamination because the sampling methods allowed the area or objects to be declared free of contamination, when a high level of contamination actually exists.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

The Extraction Problem


Sampling has one big challenge. Pathogens are small and you can't see them. Add that into the fact that no surface is smooth, and the sampling process becomes very difficult. This magnified stainless steel coupon and biofilm micro colonies allow a pretty clear picture of why bacteria is going undiscovered until it hits consumer's systems. A random swab sample isn't going to cut it. As stated by one scholar, "Listeria monocytogenes, a food borne pathogen, can attach and form biofilms on a variety of solid surfaces such as stainless steel and rubber under laboratory conditions. Even on surfaces that appear smooth, bacteria are able to find harborages that can protect them from adverse conditions."